http://www.bryandonovan.com/ruby/2008/02/05/ruby-benchmarking-ways-to-pass-options-to-a-method/ Ruby, Rails, and other Development Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:47:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 http://www.bryandonovan.com/ruby/2008/02/05/ruby-benchmarking-ways-to-pass-options-to-a-method/#comment-14 Bryan Mon, 18 May 2009 19:20:14 +0000 http://www.bryandonovan.com/ruby/2008/02/05/ruby-benchmarking-ways-to-pass-options-to-a-method/#comment-14 Thanks Peter. That's good to hear, since using delete is not as intuitive. Thanks Peter. That’s good to hear, since using delete is not as intuitive.

]]> http://www.bryandonovan.com/ruby/2008/02/05/ruby-benchmarking-ways-to-pass-options-to-a-method/#comment-13 Peter Cooper Mon, 18 May 2009 17:48:34 +0000 http://www.bryandonovan.com/ruby/2008/02/05/ruby-benchmarking-ways-to-pass-options-to-a-method/#comment-13 I know this is old and you've clearly defined you're using Ruby 1.8.4, but on Ruby 1.9.1 ops_or shows up as consistently faster than delete. The merge technique is still some three times slower though, as in your results. I know this is old and you’ve clearly defined you’re using Ruby 1.8.4, but on Ruby 1.9.1 ops_or shows up as consistently faster than delete. The merge technique is still some three times slower though, as in your results.

]]>