<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mocha - A great test framework for Node.js</title>
	<link>http://www.bryandonovan.com/blog/2011/12/05/mocha-a-great-test-framework-for-nodejs/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated mostly to software development</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bryandonovan.com/blog/2011/12/05/mocha-a-great-test-framework-for-nodejs/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bryandonovan.com/blog/2011/12/05/mocha-a-great-test-framework-for-nodejs/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hey Rob, yeah, I didn't get very far with expresso for the same reasons.  Expresso does have code coverage, though, which would be nice.  It will be in mocha one of these days though.  

Also check out buster.js (http://busterjs.org/).  Looks like it's very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob, yeah, I didn&#8217;t get very far with expresso for the same reasons.  Expresso does have code coverage, though, which would be nice.  It will be in mocha one of these days though.  </p>
<p>Also check out buster.js (http://busterjs.org/).  Looks like it&#8217;s very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.bryandonovan.com/blog/2011/12/05/mocha-a-great-test-framework-for-nodejs/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bryandonovan.com/blog/2011/12/05/mocha-a-great-test-framework-for-nodejs/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>OMG, I know who you're referring to when you say the Elders .. hehe. Funny Bryan, I ended up on your blog on a google search for mocha vs jasmine .. nice SEO! Anyway, I've been using jasmine for a while and it's ok but I'm thinking of trying out mocha which seems to have a somewhat interchangeable syntax so my old tests should still work.

I don't really have a reason to switch from jasmine to mocha but I'm keen to give it a whirl. I ended up using expresso yesterday since traversal, an pretty neat npm, has a readme that suggests using it. But it ain't got no before/beforeEach, etc. as far as I can see so forget it.

Anyway, I'm going to add you to my reader so keep up the writing Bryan and don't mess with them Elders!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, I know who you&#8217;re referring to when you say the Elders .. hehe. Funny Bryan, I ended up on your blog on a google search for mocha vs jasmine .. nice SEO! Anyway, I&#8217;ve been using jasmine for a while and it&#8217;s ok but I&#8217;m thinking of trying out mocha which seems to have a somewhat interchangeable syntax so my old tests should still work.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have a reason to switch from jasmine to mocha but I&#8217;m keen to give it a whirl. I ended up using expresso yesterday since traversal, an pretty neat npm, has a readme that suggests using it. But it ain&#8217;t got no before/beforeEach, etc. as far as I can see so forget it.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m going to add you to my reader so keep up the writing Bryan and don&#8217;t mess with them Elders!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

